MATH BLOCK: A Math Story That’ll Make You Laugh Out Loud

202856-math-anxiety
“Your daughter has a serious math block”, Mrs Lederer advised my parents at the mandatory conference at the end of my fifth grade year. “She needs a tutor”.

Although I knew, of course, that math wasn’t my strong suit, I wasn’t aware that I actually suffered what sounded like a quasi-medical problem, so Mrs. Lederer’s pronouncement filled me with excitement. A “math block” sounded like a significant, rare, possibly even exotic condition, almost a diagnosis, one that wasn’t too personal to drop casually into conversation for minor dramatic effect, like my friend Ruthie referenced her allergies. I had deep admiration for Ruthie’s deft use of allergies to decline all the food she hated. Aside from giving her an unchallenged pass on kiwis and mushrooms, it placed her in an elite group of classmates with special conditions, of which I had exactly none: no allergies, never a cast, glasses, or braces; not even divorced parents, much more a rarity in the early 70s than now.

Since having a math block was like having math allergy, I expected it would afford me similar protection, as long as I remembered my manners. “No thank you”, I’d say next year when our sixth grade math teacher passed out the pop quizzes we all dreaded. “I have a math block,” I’d explain, “so I can’t do fractions or take math tests”. Here I’d pause, before politely adding, like Ruthie did, “you can ask my parents”.

Despite my parents’ obedient acquisition of a long succession of math tutors, as years progressed it became clear that Archimedes himself could not illuminate the darkness that shrouded the path to my understanding mathematics. The simple truth, reduced to its essence, was if I couldn’t memorize it, like the times tables, I couldn’t do it. Algebra, in particular, would prove to be my undoing.  “It’s amazing”, exclaimed Tutor #2, scrutinizing my abysmal practice sheets with growing wonder. “You actually do better when you randomly guess the answer than when you try to work it out”.

This was true. Even with help from the tutors, I failed Algebra twice, took it two more times, and then managed to pass it only after my teacher tutored me one summer, cleverly using the opportunity to feed me every question and every answer that would be on the final test.

Algebra was so traumatic for me that merely seeing a negative number on a piece of paper flooded my body with adrenalin, jump-starting me into high anxiety mode. Already disgruntled by any number system that incorporated the alphabet, I simply could not understand Algebra’s application; lacking that information, I would never conquer it.

“But what is it for?” I would demand of the tutors.

“Math is a language”, they’d intone. But it wasn’t; I was good at languages, and I knew what they were for. You needed language to say “Take your bare ass off my pillow”. Try saying that with integers.

“What is algebra for?” I’d ask the next tutor.

“You’ll find yourself using Algebra over and over again in many different ways throughout the rest of your life.” In the five decades that have since passed, years that have encompassed activities as disparate as practicing law and gardening, grieving and getting high, traveling and voting, hiring people and burying them, shooting pool and raising children, studying Sanskrit and skiing — I cannot recall a single instance that called for the factoring of polynomials.

“What is the purpose of Algebra?”,  I paraphrased.

“Algebra”, Tutor #4 declared grandiosely, “is about logic”.

“Logic”, I repeated, stupefied. “Logic?”

Indeed, of all possible answers, “logic” was the least credible. Algebra was anything but logical. It seemed, actually, to defy logic, featuring among other mysteries the categories of  “irrational numbers”, which seemed to me not only to be stating the obvious, but also rubbing it in.

While negative and irrational numbers confounded and frustrated me,  I was driven to foot-stomping tantrums by the introduction of imaginary numbers.  Evidently, these are numbers that don’t even exist — or, if they do, it’s only in your imagination, like playmates and monsters. Their existential nature frustrated me to the point of hysteria, which the tutors could not quell. “How am I supposed to learn something that isn’t real!” I shouted, sweeping my workbook off the dining room table.

What kind of person, I wondered, would devise a system requiring us to make calculations with numbers that didn’t exist?

I’ll tell you what kind. Imagine a bunch of mathematicians in the year 525 – Greek, so they’re in togas, sitting on white marble blocks in a hotel ballroom, fiddling with their protractors or whatever. One quietly tunes his lyre as the group discourses on the wonders of the number systems they’d been inventing:

Thales: You know, guys, we’ve done a hell of a job with the math–we’re rockin it!

Pythagoras: Yep…..right on schedule for A.D. . . . I can’t wait! I really think the number systems we’ve invented could change the world! (Strums a chord)

Polycrates: Listen, Thag, excuse me;  guys, something’s been bugging me, ya know, I hate to be a big downer . . . but am I the only one thinking we should somehow  . . .  back up our work? What if our numbers get lost or  . . . stolen  . . . you know the Egyptians, they do have that reputation . . . not that I’m ethnic stereotyping . . . but . . . suppose we “misplace” our numbers? It’s happened before, remember? That time we invented last names for everyone, and then lost them all?

Pythagoras: Excellent point, Crate. (And by the way, the last name thing never really caught on, to tell you the truth.)  Thales and I share your concern about our number systems being lost or . . . “borrowed”. (Strum) And we studied the problem from every angle, and as we did, we reached a momentous conclusion. (Buzz of excitement from the men.) Tell them, Thales.  (Strum)

Thales: Well, what we found was that the world seems to consist of opposites . . . yet  . . . it seems a thing can become its own opposite! Therefore, they cannot truly be opposites but rather must both be manifestations of some underlying unity that is neither! (Gasps and murmurs of disbelief.)

Anaximander: Sooo . . . .?

Pythagoras: So, our number systems are an essential part of this theory. . . . Men, Thales and I have reason to believe these number systems are far more important than any of us ever dreamed, and we just can’t risk losing them. They need to be up and rolling by A.D.. So I invented a set of, well – standby numbers . . . as backups, in case we lose the ones we’ve established so far. These backup numbers exist only in our minds, only in memory, you see . . . so I call them . . .  (fast thrilling riff of flamenco chords) . . . imaginary numbers!

Pherykides: : Well done, Pythagoras. (Searching toga for pen.) Hey Crate, do you have a

 quill I can borrow?

******

Along with Algebra, word problems presented a special challenge. Word problems were an ugly trick math teachers devised to lull their verbal, math-blocked students like me into the false confidence we could solve math problems. Bait and switch!

“Word problems”, I thought triumphantly. Words! Now here finally – sixth grade – was arithmetic at which I could excel, for if anyone could solve a word problem, it was I. I was great with words, I loved words and welcomed them and their problems into my life. Crossword puzzles, Scrabble, newspaper jumble – pitch ’em my way, I thought smugly. Good or well? I or me? Further or farther? Hanged or hung, lit or lighted, lay or lie? Oh yes, I relished a good word problem. If they wanted to throw in a couple of numbers so they’d qualify as “arithmetic”, I was sure I could handle it.
It took just one test to puncture my confidence. These weren’t “word problems” at all. They were just math equations lurking like spies in an unsuspecting community of words: Algebra, undercover.

And, typical of school textbooks in the 1970’s, the action in the word problems was tedious and hopelessly pedantic, consisting of the mind-numbing activities of “Jack”, a boy of undisclosed age, who spent his time sorting fruit into baskets, or riding the train roundtrip between the same two cities. Back and forth and back and forth Jack traveled, his purpose unexplained. With no apparent job or hobby, no requirement he attend school, no parents or authority figures telling him what to do, and evidently, no obligations at all, Jack was a figure of both envy and derision.

Given Jack’s leisurely lifestyle, it was patently unfair to burden us – busy with class, homework, scouts, ballet, and karate – with the task of calculating how fast his train was moving based on what time it arrived at the station, especially when he never even got off. Jack could jolly well figure it out himself. After all, he had nothing but time, and his interest in the answer couldn’t possibly be any any slighter than our own.

Today, I view Jack’s plight with far more insight, and no small amount of pity. If back then we’d only just given him a friendly wave and maybe said, “ Hey, Jack”,  that might have given him some relief from his hopeless, helpless fate, with its unavoidable implications of  sexual impotence and forlorn human isolation. Marooned on the train, trapped forever in a looping circuit he could not control, Jack’s destiny was to travel continuously but never to arrive. Whatever relief he scrounged from occasionally tossing oranges into this basket and apples into that one would have been minimal indeed compared to the bleak reality of his endless round trip journey to nowhere.

I rarely saw Jack again after I left sixth grade; for all I know, he is still on the train.. Word problems weren’t particularly well-suited for Geometry anyway. And ultimately, it was Geometry that saved me. It was a logical, useful discipline whose application was obvious: you could use it to build houses or draw basketball courts, make newspaper hats and paper airplanes, play air hockey and design bridges. The angles weren’t negative, the theorems weren’t irrational, the proofs weren’t imaginary. Since this made sense to me,  my math block improved a bit, and I started getting “9”‘s on math tests instead of “3’s.

Our pal Pythagoras – who frankly had no business fooling with all those numbers that didn’t exist, when there was an infinite amount of perfectly real numbers available and seeking employment  – became obsessed with a triangle he met at the 520 B.C. Summer Olympics and ended up writing this theorem about her that became really popular and eventually went platinum. I learned it and still recite it in the car or shower sometimes. It’s the only math theorem I know. Ha, Mrs. Lederer! I knew could do it. Take that!

-by Caro Marks

Copyright 2015

 

Cereal Memoirs: Breakfasts of Childhood

I love cereal. Along with hook & loop fasteners and Post-It Notes, cereal is one of humankind’s greatest achievements. Unlike some of the other delicacies popular during the 1970’s (Kraft Macaroni & Cheese), I have carried my fondness for cereal into my adult years. Indeed, there have been times in my adult life when a bowl of Cheerios was absolutely the only viable option for dinner.

For ten years of our lives, my two brothers and I spent an average (conservatively) of 650 hours – or 27 days –  sitting together at our kitchen table, eating cereal (five days a week x 15 minutes a day = 1.25 hours a week x 520 weeks). Qualitatively different from lunch, which we didn’t often eat together, and dinner, whose ambiance was affected by the presence of the parents, our cereal breakfasts, no matter how superficial the interactions, forged bonds between my brothers and me that endure to this day.

Raised in a drafty old house the Richmond district of San Francisco, we were three kids under nine years old, all departing for school around the same time each day. The second we awakened, we would quickly dress, then race down the cold hall. We’d make a crashing stop at the bathroom, and then tumble together down the curving stairway, yelling, shoving, kicking, and blocking one another in our haste to be first into the kitchen, the warmest room in the house. There, the old stove squatted next to a corner heating vent, and whoever got to it first could wedge himself in front of the vent, next to the stove, and get warm . . . . well, warm-ish.

 Warm-ish because the parents kept the thermostat so low that the vent emitted only the mildest whisper of heat, really more the memory of heat than the real thing, but it was better than nothing, and the first to reach it got to stay as long as he wanted, and could even get dressed right there. Our middle brother, M, usually won the race and he spent many mornings before school lodged in front of that vent, trying to absorb the faint wafts of heat while he daydreamed and ate his cereal.
Defeated, D and I would slink into the kitchen after him, and I’d climb on the yellow stool and take down one of my two favorite cereals. I don’t like sweets in the morning, so Rice Krispies were my mainstay. Next to the box, I’d put the carton of milk, and a bowl and a spoon, the three accoutrements that together comprise the international symbol for “I’m having cereal”. After preparing the cereal but before tasting it, I’d bow my head to the bowl to listen to the Krispies sing the short hym that made them famous, its snap-crackle-pop chorus always thrilling, even though it was – possibly because it was – so predictable.

On the other side of the table, my brothers did not share my aversion to morning sweets. M was a passionate aficionado of Cap’n Crunch. His ability to eat massive quantities of these abrasive, gritty, sugar-coated corn cubes without shredding the roof of his mouth to ribbons inspired genuine awe. I rarely took the risk, but when I did sample Cap’n Crunch, I nibbled it ever so cautiously, fretting the sharp nuggets would lacerate the roof of my mouth. I could not understand how anyone ate it without bleeding. Maybe devotees waited for the cereal to get soggy before they risked biting into those thorny nubbins.

That theory, though, was wrong. The razor-sharp cereal doesn’t soften in milk, and we know this because the cereal’s spokesman told us so. Cap’n Crunch, a short, boxy man with a debonair mustache and a bad haircut, whom I now believe to have had a severe, untreated alcohol problem, boasted that the cereal “stays crunchy, even in milk…”.     So, how did my my brothers manage to eat this cereal without ripping the flesh off their tongues? Another one of life’s small mysteries remains unsolved. . . .

For kids like us who ate popular cereals and watched TV during the 1960’s and 1970’s, cereal mascots like the Cap’n were integrally related to the cereals they represented, and no cereal was without one. Their TV and box presence was so ubiquitous that none of us would have been particularly surprised if one morning we looked up from our bowls to see Sugar Bear, Tony the Tiger or Trix Rabbit sharing our table, reading the back of one another’s cereal boxes and shivering in our drafty kitchen.

Before he began his morning perusal of the cereal box’s text, riddles or comics, our youngest brother, D would devour a few huge, dry handfuls of the blood-sugar-spiking Lucky Charms. This cereal contains marshmallows, transmorgrified into tiny, innocent-appearing pastel-colored hearts, moons, stars, and clovers.  Marshmallows are close relatives of candy, or at least parents think so. That’s why a long time ago, as though placing the marshmallows into the Witness Protection Program, General Mills altered their shape, color and texture and renamed them “marbits” (a portmanteau of “marshmallow bits”).

This transparent effort to disguise the true nature of the marshmallows might have fooled the parents, but didn’t fool us: Whatever the grown-ups wanted to call them, these were marshmallows; they constituted 25% of this cereal, and that meant – impossible! – we could eat candy for breakfast. Candy! In the morning! Suh-weeeeet! Magically delicious, indeed! My brothers couldn’t get enough.

Relatively speaking, Lucky Charms is a complex, multi-faceted cereal; inside every box is a universe of drama and intrigue, most of it generated by its spokesperson, a small leprechaun with a kitschy Irish accent and an artificially avuncular tone of voice. “Lucky” an agile, hyperactive, short, green prankster, seemed to spend his every waking minute defending his bounty – the marbits – from takeover robberies by aggressive marshmallow thieves, who were “always after [his] lucky charms”. Lucky rebuffed their every effort. Nevertheless, despite their zero percent success rate over years of thwarted attempts, these marauders persisted in their efforts to take Lucky’s loot, rather than shifting their attentions to lower-security marshmallow outposts like campgrounds or Boy Scout jamborees.

As for Lucky, he was no smarter. Despite his 100% success rate at keeping the outlaws at bay, Lucky never relaxed the white-knuckled vigilance he maintained over his “charms”. The parties were forever at a standoff.

I must say, as an adult contemplating this situation, I am struck by its overtones of irony, hopelessness, and frustrated sexual desire. Indeed, from the wry joke of the leprechaun’s name to his own and the robbers’ Sisyphean destinies, trapped forever in their depressing cycles of failure, Lucky Charms was a kids’ cereal grappling with some dark adult challenges. That accounted in part for its popularity in our house, where the three of us lauded the persistence of the bad guys as enthusiastically as we condemned their incompetence, wishing that just once, they could relieve the spry green leprechaun with the annoying voice of at least some of his charms.

D and M were also Froot Loops fans. “Gimme that!”, D would yell, grabbing at the box M held aloft and just out of reach. “Come get it”, M would retort, tossing the box over D’s head and onto the table. There, the cereal would spill out, its distinct, plasticky, sickening, sugary aroma wafting nauseatingly into the air.

From its color to its smell to its flavor, this is one cereal I can’t abide. I was so accustomed to unsweetened cereals that the first time I tasted Froot Loops, I knew there was fraud afoot. Despite its claims, I thought, the cereal’s little colored Loops were not correspondingly fruit-flavored. The orange Loops did not taste like oranges any more than the red ones tasted like cherries. In fact, I was sure, all the Loops had the identical disgusting flavor.

My theory generated concerted objection from my brothers. One Saturday morning after a couple of years of morning debate, I conducted a short, yet elegant experiment, blindfolding D and challenging him to distinguish one Loop from another. This would prove, and it did, that every single Loop had the same flavor.

The boys then grudgingly conceded that “technically”, I was correct: all Loops were the same flavor. “But so what?”, M challenged.  “It’s still a fruity taste”.

“No, no no,” I protested, grabbing D’s spoon and zinging a Loop at M. “The point is, there is no fruit that tastes like this Froot Loop, and they all have the same disgusting fake flavor!”

“Yes there is”, he insisted. “Its called ‘Froot’. F-R O O T Loops. The actual flavor’s called ‘Froot'”.

“Really?” I retorted. “Then show me one singe actual fruit that’s spelled f-r-o-o-t!”

“Who cares”, D interrupted, taking a swig of milk from the carton. “No one ever said the stupid Loops had different flavors”.

This was inaccurate, as I proved with another simple experiment. Someone certainly did make that misrepresentation, and that someone was none other than– yep, Toucan Sam, mascot for Froot Loops, star of its commercials. and – if memory serves me – sometimes-speaker of Pig Latin, which he showed off in the TV ads.

Like his fellow TV celebs Lucky and the Cap’n, Sam had a special talent: he could sniff out a bowl of Froot Loops wherever it might be hiding.  Why was it hiding? No idea. How did he find it?  “Follow your nose,” he intoned, “it always nose. The flavor of fruit wherever it grows!” This was the core misrepresentation that  induced “Moms” to buy Froot Loops: the suggestion they contained real “growing” fruit, when in fact nothing could have been further from the trooth.

Despite the entertainment provided by the mascots and their dramas, the most exciting part of the cereal experience was the box offerings. Along with Cracker Jack, box cereal was the only food that offered us kids bribes in addition to sustenance. The bribes came in many forms, starting with the actual cereal box, the backs of which could offer myriad treasures, from 78 RPM records of “Yellow Submarine” (records! On a cereal box!) to mazes, baseball cards, Lone Ranger cut outs, cardboard airplanes, and puzzles. Plus, of course, the boxes contained wordage, and plenty of it, all targeted at the multitudes of kids like us who wanted to read as we crunched.

More bribes could be found inside the cereal boxes, and all pretense at civility broke down when there was a new box of cereal waiting to be opened and plumbed for a kazoo, little book, decal tattoo, or bike reflector. The parents expected us to take turns opening the new boxes, but they may as well have asked a pack of starving wild dogs to ‘sit’ or ‘shake’, so bloodthirsty were we to find and pocket the prize. I can see D, a jacket over his pajamas, his entire arm buried deep in a box of Honeycomb groping for the prize, running through the kitchen, M behind him yelling, “Give it back!”

Once as M plunged both hands into a box of Quisp to find the parachute-man, D and I yanked the box away from him so violently it flew up into the air and broke the ceiling light, causing a shower of glass shards and little Quisp-saucers to rain down upon us as our skirmish distinegtrated into a barroom-type brawl.

Cereal’s final enticement lay in the endless box tops campaigns, in which you could score a prize if you mailed the fold over box tops to the company to prove you bought the cereal. Requiring an envelope and stamps, the boxtops were a bit beyond us; the fact that the companies almost always wanted boxtops from two boxes of cereal displeased the parents, who hated being manipulated into making a purchase they might not otherwise make solely to win a plastic “prize” their kids would fight over for 15 minutes before it broke.

It wasn’t until we were older that my brothers and I experimented with the next tier of breakfast cereals, which included less sugary varieties like Shredded What, as we called the funny little haystacks, Raisin Bran and Wheaties. To us, these represented the more “mature” cereal choices that the bigger kids sometimes ate. Concerned about the quality of the box prizes, and hearing repeated rumors that none of these sensible cereals contained even one marshmallow, my brothers successfully postponed this landmark event until we were well over 11 years of age.

Until then, when our schedules began to diverge, the three of us continued to eat breakfast together, bundled up in the polar climate of the kitchen, critiquing box prizes or reading box text, until cars loaded with kids pulled up outside, tearing us away from one another, and spiriting each of us off to school.

Wednesday I Saw My Dead Brother at Safeway

” I’m not overtired, overwrought, overwhelmed, overdramatizing, or overreacting. . . . “
Yes, it’s true.
Last Wednesday Greg and I went to Safeway for shoelaces, and we got separated in the store.

 After searching for him unsuccessfully for a few minutes,  I jogged down Aisle 1 to the back of the store, to walk perpendicular to the aisles so I could look down each one until I found shoelaces and/or Greg.

And that’s how I spotted you.  There in Aisle 7, “Ethnic Foods”,  there you were, yes, you were there: I saw you. You, my brother.  You were wearing those baggy black jeans with the frayed cuffs, your Vans sneakers and a grey hoodie I didn’t recognize. You were alone. You were standing next to the Chinese food shelf, and you were peering at a row of  bottles–oils or sauces, I think. Your hand rested on the cart next to you. I wish now I’d thought to look in it.  I watched in disbelief as you studied the bottles. Then you looked up and that’s when our eyes met.

You  looked just the same as always:  a detached, slightly distracted expression around your eyes,  and some private internal amusement leaving a faint smile on your lips. Not alarming, not scary, except it was alarming and scary, because… you are dead.

 

Remember? You died in August, 2012.   I know because I was there:  I saw you right before you died.  I know because I was one of the people carrying your coffin over the grassy moguls in the cemetery, transporting you – and I’m sure you’ll understand that we all simply assumed it was in fact you in that coffin, though come to think of it,  the proof was entirely circumstantial, as I never actually observed you inside it – from  from the slope where the rabbi performed the service up and across the wet hilly grass to your grave.  There,  our youngest brother and I and some others,  slipping on the muddy earth, lowered your coffin onto some kind of platform already rigged and waiting to lower you into your grave. Yes. Sobbing, we put you in the ground. Yes. Sobbing, we threw stones onto your coffin. Yes. Sobbing, we heard the rabbi singing. Do you remember, it was raining?

Mostly, I know you died,  because after August 9, I never  saw you again — until last Wednesday, almost two years later.

 Our encounter at Safeway happened fast, much faster than it takes me to recall it,  yet I’ll never forget it.  You looked up from the bottles and jars you were studying, and when our eyes met, I knew at once it was you.  No matter what Greg and my friends say, there was no confusion, no double-take, no having to think about it, and no doubt.  I’m not in denial, drugged, or hallucinating.  I’m not overtired, overwrought, overwhelmed, overdramatizing, or overreacting. I’m not mad, mentally ill, or mistaken. It was YOU. When you glanced up and saw me, your eyes locked right onto mine, but not aggressively, like they did the day before you died, when you could no longer speak with your mouth, and your eyes communicated with that strange, rapt urgency….. Frankly, your gaze was curiously unexcited; gentle,  mildly curious, politely expectant.  As always, a bit amused.

 

But I was not. Amused, that is. The instant I recognized you, all my fingers simultaneously opened — I mean they straightened — hard, as though to fling off burning embers. I know I took a step back. As I stared at you a shiver started at the back of my neck, and spread slowly up my head, leaving a chilled mix of hot and cold sweat behind my ears and at my hairline. I felt my chest constrict (or maybe that was my heartbeat) , and for a second, I held my breath.  Our eye contact continued a few more seconds until you looked away, back to the shelf you’d been examining. It didn’t occur to me at the time, but now I wonder, were you possibly — hungry?

 I?  Well, yes, I was shocked, of course, yes, shocked to tears. Running into my dead brother in the ethnic foods aisle at the grocery store was not covered in any of the death-and-grieving books I read after you died.  It was not one of “the stages”, you know what I mean?None of my friends who’d recounted their own experiences with the death of a close sibling ever mentioned encountering the dead person in a grocery store.
And the fact is that after two years, I’d finally, reluctantly begun to accept the unbelievable reality that my younger brother – best friend of my childhood, conspirator, confederate,  trustee, confidant, and person who’d known me longer than anyone – you – died, actually died. So you can imagine my surprise at encountering you at all, anywhere…..but at Safeway? The most prosaic place in the world. And you, the least prosaic person.
It’s been almost two years since you left us, and though I am “better” (that is, I  don’t cry as much as I did),  I still cry for you.  Sometimes I feel as though I am the only one who still cries for you.  Your little boys, of course,  have their own way of managing your loss, children grieve differently, don’t they? The twins at six and the oldest boy at ten years old are still young enough to be intrinsically resilient,  both physically and spiritually.  And their memory operates differently from adult memory. It  seems less freighted with emotion and more fact-focused than  ours.

 

And to her credit, their mother ensures their lives are full, happy,  cluttered with laughter, books, music, explorations, trips,  and experiments; and full of the rich and astonished discoveries that make happy childhoods. They have wonderful lives, your boys, and you are a big part of it.  Their mother understands their intellectual  and emotional limits, and effortlessly keeps you in the centerpiece of their memories.  They talk about you freely and openly, and photos of you are all over the house:  you with all three boys,  you with each boy individually, and  plenty  of photos of all five of you, and of you and their mother. Your stuff remains on the walls and surfaces throughout the house, though the rooms have been painted. Yes, she does a great job.

 Of course, though… she goes on dates,  Not only that, but she laughs and jokes and travels and plays, with her friends and her dates and your little boys. I guess this is what she wants to do.

 

Our youngest brother laughs and jokes when he recalls funny memories about you, like how when we were little our house was so cold that you used to get dressed every morning under the piano, in front of the heating vent. You sat on the floor blue-lipped and shivering, backed up to the wall and trying to warm up, only our parents kept the thermostat so low that the vent emitted only the mildest whisper of heat, really more the memory of heat than the real thing.

And of course, your friends remember you. They mention  you In their social networking and alumni notes. Facebook friends send you birthday greetings, which seems strange to me.  Really, though,  your friends have moved on;  they sing and check their watches and listen to music and go to work and have sex and play ping pong and watch TV.

 

Sometimes they think of you, I guess, if something or someone reminds them that once,  you were with us. And now you are not.  And we cannot say where you are. I wonder if anyone still finds these three facts as disconcerting as I do.   I wonder if they understand that the mystery posed by these three facts would be utterly overwhelming but for humankind’s ability to “keep” you preserved in our memory. Indeed,  is that not memory’s primary purpose? To keep a cherished item alive?

Even memory, though, can hurt. That’s why the people close to you have placed a blanket on your memory, so when they remember you, the pain isn ‘t sharp and hard anymore.  Instead, its soft and pillowy. I think I am the only one left who has not muffled your memory.  I know everyone is waiting for me to unfold my own blanket, but if I  too, stuff a blanket onto the shards that were stabbed into my heart when you died,  who will keep you alive – unmuffled and real –  in memory? Who will stay sad for you?

 

The one false note, the one thing bothering me –  is the market. I’m sure you stopped at Safeway now and again, for…maybe dog food or….shoe laces?  But you were a Farmers Market/Whole Foods/Coop/Trader Joe’s man, weren’t you, so healthy; no transfats, no GMO’s,  all foods organic, local, free range, hormone-free,  all that stuff…you never even ate Chinese food. Whatever were you doing at Safeway?   And by any chance, do you know where the shoelaces are? I never found them.